Palestine recognition is not about human rights

Julio Levit Koldorf
Nov 3
1 min read

Updated: Nov 12

—JNS

The article argues that the recent announcements by several Western nations to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state are not acts of courage or moral conscience, but rather an exposure of political cowardice and intellectual collapse in the West. Author Julio Levit Koldorf asserts that this recognition is a conceptual absurdity because it elevates one national claim based on political expediency while ignoring the suffering and lack of sovereignty for numerous other stateless and persecuted nations—including the Kurds, Druze, Assyrians, and Yazidis—demonstrating that human rights are no longer universal. The article maintains that "Palestine" has become the West's new moral crusade because it provides an "eternal scapegoat" to distract from Europe's own domestic crises, such as economic distress, uncontrolled migration, and growing social unrest. Ultimately, the recognition is denounced as an act of appeasement and surrender to angry mobs, which rewards violence with legitimacy and betrays the principle of universal human rights by making the oppression of other nations irrelevant unless it can be "pinned on the Jews," a historical pattern that the author warns will lead to the destruction of Europe itself.

Support my work

By supporting my work, you directly contribute to the substantive work required for these groundbreaking facts-based perspectives.

The right side of history

— JNS In the article Dr. Julio Levit Koldorf argues that contemporary moral outrage has become performative and selective, driven more by ideological fashion than by genuine concern for human suffering. It contrasts the global indifference toward severe humanitarian catastrophes in places like Africa with the intense, often disproportionate focus on Israel, which the author contends is framed through symbolic narratives unsupported by empirical evidence. This imbalance, he su

Julio Levit Koldorf

My Best Enemy

— JNS In the article, Dr. Julio Levit Koldorf argues that the Israeli–Palestinian conflict is driven less by territory than by a symbolic choice: the Palestinian movement’s decision to cast Jews as the ideal enemy, a role the world readily accepts because Jews function as a “safe repository” for blame. This dynamic fuels global selective outrage—intense moral mobilization when Jews are involved, indifference when far greater atrocities occur elsewhere. The author concludes th

Julio Levit Koldorf

Europe in The Hague confronted with ideological struggle over jihadism and anti-Semitism

Indegazette (Belgium) On Sunday, November 23, 2025, Dr. Julio Levit Koldorf, spoke at the demonstration in front of the International Criminal Court in The Hague about the place of jihadism and Islamism in the broader history of civilizations. He compared societies and cultures to individual life cycles, in which phases of growth, maturity, and decline follow one another. In this context, Dr. Julio Levit Koldorf described Islamic civilization as one still in a kind of early a

Julio Levit Koldorf